review paper for Hamlet

These instructions are for the written extra credit opportunity: a review of a play other than those  assigned for class.

Your review must answer the following question: What was the main idea or theme of the play and how did the
technical and performative aspects you are focusing on work to represent and clarify that idea?

[Please notice that the main question of this review is NOT is the play worth seeing. After all, what good
is your opinion on such a matter if you cannot clearly express what the play was about and if it was or was
not successful in presenting that idea or ideas? This is how people studying theatre should (and those who
are in the theatre do) think about theatre. You may briefly touch on what you think the worth of the play
is in the conclusion. However, please be aware that you have to clearly answer the above question. You are
not judging the production merely on how you value its aesthetics; you are judging it on how well the play’s
ideas melded with the manner in which the production presented those ideas.]

Basic Instructions

1. Length: at least two, no more than three pages; text must be double-spaced in 12 point Times New Roman
with one inch margins on all sides.
2. Put the following information in the upper right-hand corner of the first page:
THEAXXX [Your class number]
Email Address
3. Give your review an interesting title. This is the place to be most creative in an attempt to draw the
reader into your text.
4. Every time you use the title of a play, like The Weir, it should be italicized.
5. Submit your review on Sakai via the Assignments page at 5 pm on our last day of class or within a week of
having seen the production, whichever comes first.

If you fail to follow the five basic (i.e. simple) instructions above, your extra credit will not be read.

How to Write a Review

Before you go to see the production, carefully read through the following questions. Your review does not
have to answer all of these questions—not all of them are applicable to all productions—but thinking about
them before you go to the performance will make you more observant and help with your recall when writing
the review. Consider taking notes while at the play, as specifics will be the basis of your review.

1. What have we said in class about the show? What, if anything, have we mentioned or seemed excited
about regarding the production? What have you heard from guests to the class about the show, if anything?
2. When you walk into the theatre, how do you feel? What is your first reaction? What is the stage
space and audience space like?
3. What is immediately striking about the overall “look” of the production? What are the dominant
colors, textures, and accents?
4. Is there a set? What is it like? If it is changed during performance, how is this done?
5. What kinds of sounds are you aware of (including silences, non-vocal noises, music, special
6. What do you notice about the lighting and how it is being used?
7. Do any costumes stand out as especially significant? Do the costumes help you to locate the
production or the setting’s time period?
8. Consider the casting choices—including gender, race, age, body types, and agility—on the overall
production. Does the performer’s bio (usually found in the program) match with their particular role?
9. Consider the cast’s ability to work together. Are the members “gelling” with one another? Either
way, how can you tell?
10. How would you describe how the actors are using the space, including blocking and movement? What
stands out about their physical interaction?
11. What is the relationship between the characters? What are their individual and/or collective goals?
How does the journey of the play reveal, transform, or solidify those goals?
12. How would you describe the pace of the production? If there was an intermission, are there any
differences between the parts (e.g. did the pace move more quickly after the intermission?)?
13. Are there moments that give you particular pleasure or unease?
14. Do you know if the text of the play has been altered or cut anywhere?
15. In what ways, if any, is the director’s interpretation different from what you had expected? Which
elements of the production did he or she most emphatically employ to convey his or her interpretation?
16. Is the audience’s reaction surprising to you at any time? What are those moments and how did the
audience respond?
17. How would you classify the production in terms of genre? Is it participating in many different
genres or is it fairly consistent?
18. What are the major themes of the production and how did the various parts of the production—from the
play’s title to the finished performance—contribute to the overall production and those major themes?